Rent act and Supreme court

Supreme Court gives Important Verdict on Change in usage of Rented Premises Spreme Court gives Important Verdict on Change in usage of Rented Premises The Supreme Court of India gave an important verdict whereby any changes or use of residential or business land by the tenant without prior written permission taken from the owner may lead to him being asked to vacate the said land or property. Setting aside the ruling of the Allahabad High Court on this matter, the Supreme Court Panel of Judges comprising of Chief Justice Mr. V. N. Khare and Justice Mr. Ashok Bhaan gave the owner the right to ask the tenant to vacate the residential land or business establishment if any changes are done to it without the owner’s permission. The above verdict was in context of the case between Mr. Bharat Lal Baranwal vs. Virendra Kumar Aggrawal. In 1970, Mr. Baranwal had given Mr. Aggrawal one of his three rooms on rent for using as a book store. But in 1976 Mr. Aggrawal, without the permission of his owner Mr. Baranwal, started paper production in the room taken on rent. Also in 1986, He brought a printing machine and started utilising all the three rooms owned by Mr. Baranwal. Mr. Baranwal filed a petiton in the Appellate Court. However, the Appellate Court quashed his petition saying that using the rented premises for mechanised paper production by Mr. Aggrawal was in no way a violation of the Rent Laws. Mr. Baranwal appealed in the Revision Court. The Revision Court set aside the Appellate Court decision and gave rights to the owner to ask the tenant to vacate the rented premises. However, the Allahabad High Court set aside the Revision Court Jugdement and ratified the Appellate Court Verdict. Then Mr. Baranwal appealed in the Supreme Court. Referring to Article 20 (2)(D) of the Urban Building Act, the Supreme Court gave its verdict that Mr. Aggrawal had violated the Rent Laws by using the other rooms along with the room rented to him by Mr. Baranwal and thus ratified the Revision Court’s earlier Verdict. ________________________________________ Re : Tenant can be evicted to start business: SC Tenant can be evicted to start business: SC New Delhi, October 12 A tenant can be evicted if the landlord wants to start his own business even in a field in which he or she has no prior experience, the Supreme Court has ruled. A bench of Justices Markandeya Katju and Asok Kumar Ganguly has held that if a landlord has a bonafide need of his rented premises for starting a new business and is able to prove his claim convincingly, he cannot be denied the privilege. It is not necessary that a person to succeed in business must have prior experience in the particular field as even a rookie can succeed, the apex court said. "We are of the opinion that a person can start a new business even if he has no experience in the new business. That does not mean that his claim for starting the new business must be rejected on the ground that it is a false claim. "Many people start new businesses even if they do not have experience in the new business, and sometimes they are successful in the new business also. Hence, the bench is of the opinion that the High Court should have gone deeper into the question of bonafide need and not rejected it only on the ground that Giriraj (the petitioner's son) has no experience in footwear business," the apex court said. The Supreme Court bench made the observation while allowing the appeal of landlord and petitioner Ram Babu Agarwal challenging the rulings of the Madhya Pradesh High Court. — PTI http://www.tribunei ndia.com/ 2009/20091013/ nation.htm# 3

The landlord is Mukadam, sweeper, worker and person who is whipped by bad tenants

Coowner standing and getting the choked sewer gutter cleaned. And the tenants with expensive cars and luxurious and paying 40/- p.m. rent ( and most not paying that paltry sum too) ( as they know that it is time ( life consuming and expensive affair for landlord to go to Indian court) sleep over these issues but at the same time want very high above market compansation if the issue of redevelopment comes.

Coowner Alok Tholiya spending on repairs

How to calculate or estimate damages for defamation of character??

How to calculate or estimate damages for defamation of character?? Reply: Very straight forward way to gauge self valuation; 1. Calculate general damages. General damages are those involving a loss of reputation, embarrassment, shame and emotional distress. 2. Calculate actual damages suffered by the defamation. If the defamation results in loss of a job or contract, the plaintiff can easily add up lost assets as a result of the injury 3. Request punitive damages before Court. In general, the civil justice system is not designed to punish parties, only to reimburse them. Damages are meant to make the plaintiff "whole" again. Illustration: Recently Hon’ble SC refused to interfere with a Mumbai High Court order under which Times Now News Channel has been asked to deposit Rs 20 Cr. in cash and to give a bank guarantee of Rs 80 Cr. before its Appeal against a Trial Court award of damages of Rs 100 Cr. to a former Apex court Justice Mr. P B Sawant could be heard. [However I am more interested to know who sponsored the then Justice mr. P. B. Sawant defamation case Court fee of Rs. 1 Cr to begin with or was via some mechanism it was waived off by some invisible consortium in operation !!!!] Pointer: Court fee for civil action would be calculated as per advelorum fee on the claim amount as provided under relevant State Court Fees Rules. BTW if this author's que. relates to alleged allegations of 'impotency of husband' then a Court awarded Rs. 2 L to husband after wife's wild allegation of impotency of husband was proved false. See one of my oldest post discussion on full text Judgment only if this is the case in hand !

suggestions received which I will not follow but..

govt., court must empower local Panchayat to solve the problems or form Ombudsman type of body which can resolve such petty issues without long drawn litigation as well as without allowing relations to deteriorate. .....Alok 

In my building ......

Inbox

x

Nitesh Bhatia ✆ nitesh.l.bhatia@gmail.com	Jan 31 (2 days ago)
to me

I guess that's some of the reasons why people are apprehensive in lenting out their properties.

On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Alok Tholiya <atholiya@gmail.com> wrote:

there r tenants who do not pay rent. Have cars. they park same without permission and do not pay anything. 

U feel they deserve proud living ???? But they live as if they r obliging me for living free ka, mofat ka and do all kind of dadagiri, abuses, misuse, illegal structures. Pl. suggest way out. 

Bhavesh Pandya ✆ bhav64@gmail.com	Jan 31 (2 days ago)
to me

car ki hava nikal do

open space may Garden bana do

market se old car lake park kar do

pay n parking ka contract BMC ko de do.

Magnus ✆ magnusinno@gmail.com	Jan 31 (1 day ago)
to me

Since it is your building I assume that you can do painting on the building. Paint the following on the balcony or door. " I don't pay rent" or "Mofatiya.".. I hope they won't mind as they are getting their door or window painted for free. For illegal car parkers...try to make a nest or feeding place for pigeons just above the parking area so that they have their cars treated with the finest poop.

Sent from my iPhone

On 31-Jan-2012, at 9:15, Alok Tholiya <atholiya@gmail.com> wrote:

there r tenants who do not pay rent. Have cars. they park same without permission and do not pay anything.


U feel they deserve proud living ???? But they live as if they r obliging me for living free ka, mofat ka and do all kind of dadagiri, abuses, misuse, illegal structures. Pl. suggest way out.

Chaal Baji kyo simple sidha sochana sikho.....

Free ka ?????

•Kya aap free ka khate hai???

•Kya aap manga hua pahante hai??? 

•Kys aap udhar mien paper le kar padhate hai??

•Nahi  !!!!!

•To aap free main parking kyo karte hai??

•Paise nahi hai to permission to lo lekin chaal baji kyo??  Kya Niyat bigdi hi rahti hai

नए राशन कार्डों के वितरण पर रोक

नए राशन कार्डों के वितरण पर रोक
23 Jan 2012, 0400 hrs IST,नवभारत टाइम्स

 अरविंद     त्रिपाठी॥     कल्याण
  जिन   इलाकों   में   चुनाव   होने   हैं  ,  वहां   नए   राशन   कार्ड   के   वितरण   पर   सरकार   ने   रोक   लगा   दी   है।   इस   बारे   में   नागरिक   एवं   खाद्य   आपूर्ति   विभाग   ने   राशन   कार्यालयों   को   आदेश   जारी   कर   दिए   हैं।

 16  जनवरी   को   जारी   इस   आदेश   में   चुनावों   के   दौरान   मतदाताओं   के   पहचान   और   पते   की   तस्दीक   के   लिए   राशन   कार्ड   का   इस्तेमाल   न   होने   देने   के   लिए   चुनाव   आचार   संहिता   के   दौरान   नए   राशन   कार्ड   जारी   करने   पर   रोक   लगाई   गई   है।   हालांकि   नए   राशन   कार्डों   के   आवेदन   स्वीकार   करने   पर   कोई   रोक   नहीं   लगाई   गई   हैं।   सरकारी   आदेश   में   राशन   कार्यालयों   को   स्पष्ट   आदेश   दिए   गए   हैं   कि   आचार   संहिता   खत्म   होने   के   बाद   ही   नए   राशन   कार्ड   जारी   किए   जाएं।   यह   आदेश   सभी   राशन   विभागों  ,  विभागीय   आयुक्तों  ,  जिला   कलेक्टरों   को   जारी   किया   गया   है।

  बता   दें   कि   हाल   ही   में   उल्हासनगर   में   कांग्रेस   अध्यक्ष   सोनिया   गांधी   और   उनके   परिवार   के   नाम   एक   बोगस   राशन   कार्ड   लावारिस   पड़ा   मिला   था।   इस   खबर   को   एनबीटी   ने   प्रमुखता   से   छापा   था।   इस   खबर   के   छपने   के   बाद   कई   स्तरों   से   यह   सवाल   उठने   लगा   था   कि   अगर   सोनिया   गांधी   के   नाम   पर   फर्जी   राशन   कार्ड   बन   सकता   है  ,  तो   किसी   का   भी   फर्जी   राशन   कार्ड   बनाकर   चुनाव   में   बोगस   मतदान   के   लिए   इस्तेमाल   हो   सकता   है।

  इस   आदेश   में   यह   भी   लिखा   है   कि   राशन   कार्ड   केवल   सरकारी   राशन   की   दुकानों   से   राशन   लेने   के   लिए   ही   वैध   दस्तावेज   है।   इसके   अलावा   अन्य   किसी   काम   के   लिए   इसका   इस्तेमाल   नहीं   किया   जा   सकता।   यह   सूचना   राशन   कार्डों   पर   भी   छापी   गई   है।   इसके   बावजूद   कई   सरकारी   महकमे   पते   की   तस्दीक   और   पहचान   पत्र   के   रूप   में   इसे   मान्यता   देते   हैं  ,  जो   गलत   है।