Sunday, June 10, 2012

We have worst then this neighbour but police has never acted like this

http://www.mumbaimirror.com/article/2/20120610201206100230083313e849ead/Anita-Raj%E2%80%99s-troubled-husband-arrested-on-molestation-charges.html


Anita Raj’s troubled husband arrested on molestation charges

Khar Police arrest Sunil Hingorani following complaints by female members of his Pali Hill housing society; Bandra court lets him off on bail of Rs 5,000
Posted On Sunday, June 10, 2012 at 02:30:00 AM
Controversies continue to dog Sunil Hingorani, better known as yesteryear actress Anita Raj’s husband. After a complaint at the Khar Police Station and Economic Offences Wing by once close friend Kamal Amrohi in November that Hingorani failed to return Rs 1.07 crore he had borrowed for a restaurant in Juhu, the Pali Hill resident has now been charged with equally grave offences such as outraging modesty of women, criminal intimidation and criminal trespass. And in this case the complaints come from Hingorani’s neighbours at Nibbana Annexe building.

In fact, Hingorani - members of the housing society say he has siphoned around Rs 1 crore from the society funds and also owes the society Rs 3 lakhs - was arrested by police on the basis of these charges on Friday morning and released on bail by the Bandra Metropolitan Magistrate Court later in the day.

Speaking about the charges a member of the housing society, refusing to be identified, said, Hingorani who used to be an office bearer in the society was removed from the post in December 2011 following the allegations of corruption.

The member added that in May Hingorani landed up at the house of another member of the managing committee and verbally abused her. He later corresponded with the woman’s husband over email in which too he abused her. Mumbai Mirror has copies of these emails.

While the complaint, with the Khar police and the National Commission for Women (NCW), was registered four weeks ago action was taken on Friday after the police completed its investigations.

According to the complaint lodged at the police station, on May 1 around midnight Hingorani landed up at the doorstep of the female member of the society after breaking the notice board of the society placed in the lobby. The notice board had details of the outstanding amount that Hingorani owed to the society.

At the member’s house he allegedly hurled abuses at her. “He threatened to rape her and used unwarranted language, based on that we took the complaint and initiated action,” said Senior Police Inspector Mangesh Pote.

Pote confirmed that there have been several other such complaints against Hingorani from residents of the building. Members spoke to Mumbai Mirror on condition of anonymity and even shared details of e-mails and messages that Hingorani had sent them. Another resident said Hingorani sent him lewd and rude messages regarding his daughter. The man added that Hingorani even sent a similar, lewd, email to his daughter. He has also been charged with abusing a senior citizen in the building.

The building secretary M K Gupta said, “We have also approached Home Minister R R Patil complaining about Hingorani. His behaviour has crossed all limits of civility and as a society we are using the law to help us.”

Pote said, “We have seized his phone and sent it to a technical expert to retrieve old messages. We have also implicated him under relevant section of the Information Technology Act - being section 67. We have also booked him under sections 509 (molestation), 451 (house trespass), 506 (criminal intimidation) and 427 (mischief and causing damage) of the Indian Penal Code. He has now been released on bail of Rs 5,000. He has to mark his presence at the police station every Monday between 10 am-12 pm.”


Neither Hingorani nor Anita Raj responded to Mumbai Mirror’s calls and repeated text messages.

Sunday, June 3, 2012

I alone have to spend a lot to upkeep the building open spaces

Children's of neighbouring building and their courtesy

while playing cricket. Options with them: 1. They can choos e to play Bedminton or similar games which r not harmful to self and others as there r minimum chances of accident. Where as ball can go anywhere including on road and child chasing can meet with an accident.
2. They r all veryu rich. They can put net to ensure that such accidents do not happen.
3. They can enroll their children in Balkanji bari, cricket clubs so they can paly in ground.
4. They can ask us that now on they will be playing cricket so we can put some protective plastic/ banner and protect window panes. Cost of replacing glass in negligible but getting workman is difficult. We r also not very worried abt loss of glass but are worried abt injury it cud cause if some one at that time was nera the glass window.
5. And atleast one expects sorry from the one who causes accident but such courtesy most ppl have not learnt.

Sunday, April 1, 2012

Corrupt and inefficient Mahanagar Gas ltd and its way of working......mail going to 50000 recipients

Mahanagar Gas ltd. has dug up on our gate and around our gate trenches for last 6 days. No work is on. Sr. citizens and others find same very difficult to walk and traffic is also getting blocked. Their person says the pipes to be laid are out of stock. So without inventory why did they commence the work? Can traffic police, BMC , Govt of Maharashtra explain how these agencies are allowed to delay work and inconvinience the citizens ( consisting old, sick, blind, handicap, school going children, pregnant women etc ... Earlier: 3 months back they blocked our road for resurfacing and spent a lot of funds. Two months back they dug up for laying sewer ( gutter ) line. The work halted half way because their workers suddenly left for their village ( palghar / dahanu) as they had their local bodies elections( Panchayat etc ) . What commitment to contract taken. As per their original planned they were to dig and lay pipes on south side road of but since there is a illegal chinese food vendor so he manipulated and they diverted to north side.Then they were to make main hole ( which will keep over flowing ( as we have very talented corporators and engineers in BMC ) just on the middle of my main gate. After lot of persuasion they agreed to shift same 8'. They asked bribe for doing so and I threatened fast un to death. During course of digging they broke several water pipe lines of near by buildings and including mine. Municipal staff the Ravana's of today's time patronised by Saffronists took bribe from all to restore water supply. While digging for water pipe line restoration they damaged Reliance power supply cable. Municipal staff did nothing but just informed us. We chased with Reliance emergency helpline they took time but without any tantrums and without any demands repaired same. March beginning they finished the work and refilled the trenches and now MGL ( Mahanagar Gas Limited) has started redigging. And see photos of ancient technology they adopt and Uddhav Tahkery is happy with BMC the Aamchi Mumbai Mahanagarpalika. ( By the way I thank local corporators husband from Shiv Sena who saw that municipal water dept does not delay water restoration and also offered tanker facility. Thanks and Regards, Alok Tholiya,

Friday, March 30, 2012

Rent act and Supreme court

Supreme Court gives Important Verdict on Change in usage of Rented Premises Spreme Court gives Important Verdict on Change in usage of Rented Premises The Supreme Court of India gave an important verdict whereby any changes or use of residential or business land by the tenant without prior written permission taken from the owner may lead to him being asked to vacate the said land or property. Setting aside the ruling of the Allahabad High Court on this matter, the Supreme Court Panel of Judges comprising of Chief Justice Mr. V. N. Khare and Justice Mr. Ashok Bhaan gave the owner the right to ask the tenant to vacate the residential land or business establishment if any changes are done to it without the owner’s permission. The above verdict was in context of the case between Mr. Bharat Lal Baranwal vs. Virendra Kumar Aggrawal. In 1970, Mr. Baranwal had given Mr. Aggrawal one of his three rooms on rent for using as a book store. But in 1976 Mr. Aggrawal, without the permission of his owner Mr. Baranwal, started paper production in the room taken on rent. Also in 1986, He brought a printing machine and started utilising all the three rooms owned by Mr. Baranwal. Mr. Baranwal filed a petiton in the Appellate Court. However, the Appellate Court quashed his petition saying that using the rented premises for mechanised paper production by Mr. Aggrawal was in no way a violation of the Rent Laws. Mr. Baranwal appealed in the Revision Court. The Revision Court set aside the Appellate Court decision and gave rights to the owner to ask the tenant to vacate the rented premises. However, the Allahabad High Court set aside the Revision Court Jugdement and ratified the Appellate Court Verdict. Then Mr. Baranwal appealed in the Supreme Court. Referring to Article 20 (2)(D) of the Urban Building Act, the Supreme Court gave its verdict that Mr. Aggrawal had violated the Rent Laws by using the other rooms along with the room rented to him by Mr. Baranwal and thus ratified the Revision Court’s earlier Verdict. ________________________________________ Re : Tenant can be evicted to start business: SC Tenant can be evicted to start business: SC New Delhi, October 12 A tenant can be evicted if the landlord wants to start his own business even in a field in which he or she has no prior experience, the Supreme Court has ruled. A bench of Justices Markandeya Katju and Asok Kumar Ganguly has held that if a landlord has a bonafide need of his rented premises for starting a new business and is able to prove his claim convincingly, he cannot be denied the privilege. It is not necessary that a person to succeed in business must have prior experience in the particular field as even a rookie can succeed, the apex court said. "We are of the opinion that a person can start a new business even if he has no experience in the new business. That does not mean that his claim for starting the new business must be rejected on the ground that it is a false claim. "Many people start new businesses even if they do not have experience in the new business, and sometimes they are successful in the new business also. Hence, the bench is of the opinion that the High Court should have gone deeper into the question of bonafide need and not rejected it only on the ground that Giriraj (the petitioner's son) has no experience in footwear business," the apex court said. The Supreme Court bench made the observation while allowing the appeal of landlord and petitioner Ram Babu Agarwal challenging the rulings of the Madhya Pradesh High Court. — PTI http://www.tribunei ndia.com/ 2009/20091013/ nation.htm# 3

Sunday, March 25, 2012

The landlord is Mukadam, sweeper, worker and person who is whipped by bad tenants

Coowner standing and getting the choked sewer gutter cleaned. And the tenants with expensive cars and luxurious and paying 40/- p.m. rent ( and most not paying that paltry sum too) ( as they know that it is time ( life consuming and expensive affair for landlord to go to Indian court) sleep over these issues but at the same time want very high above market compansation if the issue of redevelopment comes.