BMC Notice for structural audit for Tholiya Bhavan as per legal requirement

I welcome this act which asks for compulsory structural audit of buildings older then 30 years. However same law does not bind local politicians and BMC officials in any way to act in particular time frame after having received the report. For my other building while I gave the report in time and report says building is very old and dilapidated but BMC has it seems just filed the report. I have sent copy to local police, local corporator too but response and advise from them is still awaited. All laws which bind citizens must also bind govt officials too to act in particular time frame or the same punishment as envisaged under law against citizens should also be applicable to officials and area elected representatives. 

My poor tenant and their costly counsels and courts not asking for proof

[What they said about Adcocates] My poor tenant and their costly counsels and courts not asking for proof

Inbox

x

Blogger	5:40 PM (4 hours ago)
to me

In 1989  I purchased building now known as Saburi at Vakola Bridge Santacruz East, In 1990  tenant Mrs Bina Chowdhari filed a case claiming tenancy right to terrace, exterior walls ( do not laugh as court gave the injunction in her favour without seeing any proof of claim which of course she does not possess).
The case is on till date and not reached even half the stage.

Our jurisdiction court is is Bandra ( western suburbs of Mumbai). for tenancy cases in Small Causes court. The Head office of this court which is a main court for rent act matters is at Princess street , Dhobi taloa , Marine lines. It is about 20 KM away from Bandra court. Main court being old has many more seasoned advocates, have their offices near by , they also easily practice  high court which is near by, the clients they cater are from posh south Mumbai so the property is precious and much costlier then suburbs.

All this would normally mean that advocates who are practicing in main small causes court are busy and costly. A busy senior professional would visit for one or few client specially suburbs would naturally mean that he is suitable compensated.
I have heard Advocate's like Harish Salvi even demand charter flight. My one family member was sent to Ad Mrunali for family court issue and she charged Rs 20000/- for so called conference of 5 minutes. This member had gone thru a good reference still she was charged that high , not offered any solution, not offered tea. These are present day professional  specially advocates, their charges and their rubab.

Mrs. Bina Chowdhari for over 20 years is represented by Ad Amin Nathani. who mainly practices in Main court. Has his office in South Mumbai. Owns a luxury car driven by chauffeur. Is very successful. Prepares well. Fights aggressively. And in my matter since their is no weight in matter he is able to delay the same successfully instead of trying to take it to logical end or resolve amicably.His client and my tenant Mrs Bina Chowdhri is aged above 80 years and in interim application he has filed for expediting the application on the grounds of senior citizen but does not do so for main suit for obvious reason as case is filed with no sufficient cause and for entangling me in to litigation and for arm-twisting.
Today in CR no 35 Ad Nathani said that his client is poor and old and can not afford to pay the permitted increases in rent if landlord asks for same suddenly. On a rent of Rs 138/- or so per month  ( for commercial premises in a crucial area near BKC and Airport)  the permitted increases would be few rupees. I have not worked out same and not demanded same as she thru her advocate is bound to calculate it differently will find fresh reason to delay the main suit by filing a disagreement with my claim. I have in writing before the court exempted her from paying same. I am not claiming permitted increases which are amount a beggar does not accept  now a days from my other tenants in other building too where rent for a room is Rs 30/- p..m. and permitted increases is 4%. Do u want to collect same after paying huge fees to consultant and then fear of entering in to dispute on calculation?

So as per Shri Nathani ji the Ld. Advocate of my old ailing client is poor and which he can say so before court. However she  can afford such a senior, seasoned, renowned advocate specially driving down to congested western suburbs for her, file application after application and delay the main suit for 23 years.
By the way she has another huge tenanted property of Wadia's under her. She is also tenant of entire bungalow just adjecent to 7 star delux hotel Grand hayatt at Vakola. She had another property which she sold some years back. She has 3 sons ( one of whom is a advocate and another very senior executive in corporate house) and a daughter who also is more then LLM atleast while in court.

Similarly in another matter Ad D C Mehta said my client can not afford to  pay mesne profit at market rate ( rent fixed by court on evicted tenant). However this client travels world over every year, has palatial bungalow in Jaipur and so on and best is can afford senior counsel like Ad D C Mehta who can so easily make believe court what is not true.

should not court ask them to furnish their balance sheets, passport, IT return, details of property and business owned, run , tenanted?? And if really poor then why not advise them to go to legal aid at high court for economically weak??




--
Posted By Blogger to What they said about Adcocates at 2/05/2014 04:10:00 AM

What they say about Indian Police : Delhi police v/s Mumbai police . They act when the...

What they say about Indian Police : Delhi police v/s Mumbai police . They act when the...: In 21 days of governance of AAP Govt in Delhi, every day they have to face a new controversy. Still AAP is trying its best to de...

LIC protecting misrepresentation by Madhukar Purohit

I had made a complaint to LIC , Yogkshem office that One Madhukar Purohit has taken a LIC policy with total misrepresentation viz.
1. He is permanently settled in Jaipur but for fabricating documents to show he is staying in Mumbai he has declared that he is permanent resident of Mumbai.
2. He has not declared that he is suffering from Lucoderma and declared that he is fit where as he has over 70% white patch on his body.
3. Inspite of this he has managed medical report stating that he does not suffer from any disease.
4. He had over 5 policies in Jaipur and has taken Life cover even in US but he has declared that this is his first policy.
I have substantiated everything to LIC but LIC for the sake of more business has covered up everything.
Details of Policy taken with false declaration
Insured Name : Madhukar Purohit
Policy no. 894441655
dt 28/09/10

Plan 165/ 15 for Rs 1 Lac
Branch 893 Jeevan Seva Bldg, Gr. Fl., S V Rd., Santacruz West.

His old policies issued by Jaipur LIC:
1. 193910327
2. 190554986
3. 048902912
4. 190554985
5. 190555509

Against repeat complaint LIC Executive Director (RTI) /CPIO replied vide their letter no. RTI/CO/Ashok Godha 911/SSN/201314 dt 30/10/2013 replied that no inquiry or investigation has been conducted on the complaint.

So LIC has not even taken any cognizance of complaint. Not bothered to reply. No action on fraud proposer or doctor etc..

And we are all proud of LIC.

Pl. advise whther to pay increased BMC property tax and where to pay from????

Why I am not son of IAS,IPS,IRS,VIP,Mafia,Judge, doctor,Builder other professional, milk vendor and so on who can charge as they like or even loot  and why I am a AAM ADMI? 


Dear All, 

I have received today notice from BMC demanding increased property tax from back date from 2010. The notice is claiming Rs. 25967/- . In case of failure to pay they have threatened to levy penalty of 2% per month that is 24% per year besides penal action and auctioning the property.

Sir/s, 

Out of three tenants and two trespassers only one tenant pays Rs 34 pm to me as rent. 

The tenant Chadha has two cars worth Rs 13 lacs and all other luxury but does not pay rent as he and other defaulters know that I will have to spend life and Rs. 1 lac minimum in court case for trying to recover rent which may still be elusive as he will deposit in court. 

The Purohits lost case in 2009 and were decreed but went in to 2 bench appeal where they have hired Ad  D C mehta who knows how to delay matter and does not us law but uses machinery for delaying. Ad mehta is a very costly advocate but he claimed my client is not able to pay more then Rs 200/- p.m. as mesne profit . It is on the record of court that his client has more then 5 vehicles, palatial bungalow, travel by air several time to US and other countries, has office and house in Newyork too. But court fixed mesne profit as only Rs 1000/- which I can not withdraw till order ( which is elusive for 5 years) . I asked thru RTI info on how the court has fixed in other mesne profit  but court has only made me run here and there and denied info on procedural ground . I asked AAP volunteer to file similar RTI in same court but he too got tired. 

I am not allowed to increase rent as much as BMC or others hike be it railways, professionals, grocers, parking lot wala's, milk vendor,Reliance energy, schools, colleges, doctors, hospitals, hotels and so on. . 

I am not allowed to charge interest more then 9% from defaulting tenants and can not evict them but BMC is charging 24% interest and can take penal action and also auction my property. 

I wonder what sin I had committed in last life that I am not a son of IAS,IPS, JUDGE, VIP etc ??? Why I am a AAM Admi? 

Sir do I pay these taxes ???? Pl. advise?? 

Also advise where do I get these funds if I do not have post where I can get bribe or commit scam?? 

Thanks and Regards,

Alok Tholiya,

09324225699 /   02226125699/26173203

THOLIYA BHAVAN * ALOK THOLIYA

THOLIYA BHAVAN * ALOK THOLIYA
> SPENT
> •Nov 2012 painting of common areas Rs 30000/- * August 2013 Rs 20000/-
> towards chajja repairs * OCT. 2013 RS . 40000/- ON FLOWER BED AND
> FENCING besides
> regular taxes and upkeep.
> •RENT RECEIVED Rs 34/- p.m. from Shri I C Jain ( 81 year retired persons. )
> •Other tenants and trespassers and CO-OWNERS have paid nothing.

 

WHY BUILDINGS ARE FALLING: Tenants OF Tholiya Bhavan

•

WHY BUILDINGS ARE FALLING:  Tenants OF Tholiya Bhavan

Shri I D Chadha :Rent Rs.125.26/- for 4 rooms. Not paid  for years

•Shri Pillai: Not paid  for years. Owns Honda Jazz and other car.

•Dhobi : trespasser pays nothing earns Rs 50000/- + p.m.

•Purohit: Rent Rs. 42.56 prior to 2009 lost case in court. Gone in appeal. So now paying in court. Owns palatial bungalow at Jaipur, cars etc..

• Shri I C jain : Rs 33.60 per month.

And all of them lavishly use their own tenanted premises/ illegally trespassed areas if any, common spaces, illegally parking own/guest vehicles and spend nothing to beautify the building. Rather one may find their surroundings filthy. 

And local corrupt BMC has sent bill for property tax for Rs. 9494/- per year besides we pay for land revenue Tax, for  water, for common maintenance and huge fees on advocates who in turn get us nothing except dates.

You can not find a single paisa beautification efforts from tenants who misuse and over use premises for 60 years. …... Alok Tholiya