There is a heavy leakage

There is a heavy leakage on my shutter and entrance of office from the toilet of a tenant purohit. In spite of repeated request to Mahima purohit nothing has been done so far. My shutter is rusting. Plaster of Walls are deteriorating and painting is spoilt. Worst is my visitors clothes get spoilt and dirty water falls on them. How to solve this problem where a monied tenant who can bribe one and all and mischievously harasses landlord on purpose ? You can also see our costly wall paper getting damage due to seepage from the toilet walls of this Purohit. And my father and mother did thousands of favour this family specially on Nandkishore Purohit. But they are repay like this all favors. God alone can teach them a lesson.  

https://plus.google.com/114846754682610552592/posts/

4vAQtiajVv7

Man told to pay 2L for leakages in lower floor flat

rajendra popat	8:11 PM (16 hours ago)
to Adv, bcc: me

26 Aug 2014

Hindustan Times (Mumbai)

Press Trust of India htmetro@hindustantimes.com

Man told to pay
2L for leakages in lower floor flat

ZoomBookmarkSharePrintListenTranslate

THANE: A consumer forum in Thane has ordered a flat owner to pay Rs2 lakh to a resident on a floor below as cost of repairs for leakages.
The complainant, Nandakumar Rege, CEO of Thane District Housing Co-operative Federation, said his flat on the ground floor of a society in Vishnunagar in Thane had leakages owing to a defect in the flat above his belonging to one Milind Masurkar.
He said he had asked Masurkar to carry out repairs and plug the leakages, but the latter did not respond. Hence, he informed Masurkar that he would carry out the repairs and that he (Masurkar) should reimburse the cost, to which the latter did not respond.

Rege, in his complaint filed before the forum in 2010, demanded Rs1,23,000 as cost of repairs carried out in 2009, Rs1,26,000 as compensation, Rs2 lakh for physical suffering, and Rs5,000 towards legal expenses from Masurkar.
Masurkar dismissed all allegations. Thane District Consumer Redressal Forum president Umesh Jhawalikar and member ND Kadam, decided the case after hearing both sides.

Tholiya Housing Society Issues: How to handle negligent neighbour who do not stop ...

Tholiya Housing Society Issues: How to handle negligent neighbour who do not stop ...: Frequently I hear from my friends that there flat has a water leaking from above floor and repeated request to the neighbour above has yield...

Tuesday, September 16, 2014

How to handle negligent neighbour who do not stop leakage from their flats...

Frequently I hear from my friends that there flat has a water leaking from above floor and repeated request to the neighbour above has yielded no response. Even in some cases ugly fight has taken place but they cud not find remedy. In my building my tenants have neglected to maintain, done some illegal work and thus my rooms have leakage problem spoiling my interiors, paints etc and beside weakening of building. But I too had not read this remedy as given out in magazine " MSWA 's Housing Society review" in sep 2014 issue.

I thank Maharashtra Society Welfare Association for their good advise.
I wish if my Property owners Association had given similar advise then long back I cud have neatly handled the issue of leakage due to callousness of tenants and saved my property from damage.

Here is a scan copy of article.

Madhukar Purohit and his Illegal acts and bribing skills

Kamlesh Bhathena shared Prince Kumar's photo.

34 mins · 

Prince Kumar‎Aam Aadmi Party

Bjp ki CM candidate Kiran BEDI 2 Voter-I-card rakhne k maamle mei pakdi gai..
Dono I-card alag-alag Address ke hain..
Election Commision ne shuru ki Jaanch..
‪#‎EVM‬
‪#‎FarziVote‬

Unlike ·  · Share

• You like this.
• 

  Alok Tholiya I had reported to Kherwadi election office that Madhukar Purohit has enrolled his name in Jaipur as well as in Mumbai in my building. But they did not act. He gave false affidavit that his name is not there anywhere in India except in Kherwadi Mumbai. Then I obtained RTI info from jaipur election dept and asked Mumbai sub. Collector to take action against Madhukar Purohit but he evaded after taking bribe. I asked certain info from Kherwadi election office on this which they did not. They did not reply to my RTI. Finally matter went to Shri ratnakar Gaikwad but he did not take action and asked election dept to take action which they did not as they are all corrupt. They take bribe and include names of illegal migrants and also of those who r already enrolled in Rajasthan, UP, Bihar etc..

Stop illegal parking ....do not use free ka haram ka

11^th September 2014

From:

ALOK THOLIYA

THOLIYA BHAVAN. GR. FLOOR,

10th ROAD, NEXT TO REGENCY HOTEL,

SANTACRUZ (EAST), MUMBAI: 400 055.

Tel. 26125699 / M.9324225699.

atholiya@gmail.com

To:

Ms. Mahima Purohit,

Kalyan Kunj, Mahavira Marg,

Opp. Mahavir School,

C scheme, Jaipur, Raj.

Mahima,

U r a granddaughter of tenant of Late N K Purohit who had abandoned the tenanted premises Room No. 2, Tholiya Bhavan on first floor. Sparingly this room was used by others in family or by guests. But during particular six month as submitted to small causes court in RAE suit no. 864 of 2004 this room was not at all used. We have won this case in trial court.

During pendency of case your mischievous father with a criminal intent Madhukar Purohit tried to create several evidences like reinstatement ration card, re-enrollment in election roll thru false affidavit, renewal of driving license, buying policy of LIC of India with several false claims and affirmations so on. All this with the eye on this small room??? And to further his greed and lust and for roping in additional evidence he moved you and Manavi to Mumbai to use this room.

Manavi is since married shifted to a leave and licensee flat in nearby locality.

Your family has and has had several cars and two wheeler in Jaipur but none in Mumbai. But in recent past you have taken benami car Santro MH01NA5284 which is being used by you alone and sometimes by your sisters who comes from her house all the way to pick and drop same.

You are hereby warned that do not illegally trespass in our building with any vehicle. You are neither allowed to bring in any car or vehicle inside the building nor allowed to park the same inside.

 In case in spite of this notice given prohibiting u to park your car, you forcefully park your vehicle illegally in our compound then we will be compelled to put your car on the road using towing / outside services which will be at your risks and cost which you please note.

If this act of criminal breach and trespass is not stopped then I shall be forced to take legal action as advised by my advocates and same will be at your risk and cost.

(Alok Tholiya) 

Bombay high court order brings respite to tenants of shaky buildings

This is a good move but when there is a dispute on area occupied by tenants then I am not sure how issue will be resolved.

http://www.dnaindia.com/mumbai/report-bombay-high-court-order-brings-respite-to-tenants-of-shaky-buildings-2013304

n what will build confidence among tenants/occupants of shaky buildings who refuse to leave their homes due to fear of losing them permanently, the Bombay high court has ordered Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) to take necessary steps to allay the apprehension.

The high court in a recent order asked the civic body not to issue commence certificate (CC) for redevelopment of the dilapidated structures in the absence of an agreement between landlords and tenants over providing permanent alternative accommodation to the latter.

The court gave the order as part of guidelines in connection with buildings which fall under C1 category (ones which need to be evacuated immediately in view of demolition) structures — both private and BMC-owned.

The order also applies to structures which have been served notice under section 354 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation (MMC) Act, 1888. The guideline was issued after the BMC approached the high court seeking directives in view of the difficulties faced by
it in implementation of notices served under the aforesaid section, given the absence
of specific provisions in the MMC Act for eviction of occupants from the dilapidated buildings.

According to the order, in case privately-owned dangerous buildings are demolished by the corporation in exercise of power under section 354 (read with the order passed), then the BMC shall, while granting sanction of redevelopment, impose a condition in intimation of disapproval (IOD) that no CC will be issued under section 45 of the MRTP Act, 1966 unless and until there is an agreement, either providing a permanent alternative accommodation in a newly-constructed building or a settlement is arrived at by and between the tenants/occupants and the landlord in respect of the said demolished premises is filed with the corporation.

"This guideline will help bring in transparency in the process of redevelopment of shaky structures. The court has also asked BMC to prepare a list of dangerous buildings and also measure the carpet area of their houses. This will help stop cheating of residents/occupants once the project is redeveloped," a senior civic official said.

As reported in dna earlier, the civic body has identified 543 C1 category structures in Mumbai ahead of the monsoon. The 'L' ward, which covers suburbs like Kurla, has the highest number of shaky structures, that is, 100. Some rickety buildings in the city include some of the known structures like Shakti Mills along E Moses Road and Campa Cola factory on BG Kher Marg in Worli.

The issue of rickety structures is of major concern to the BMC as 84 persons lost their lives in four major building crash incidents over the past one year.

tenants who exploit, misuse, harass, misbehave and yet shamelessly want landlords to help

A tenant pays rent of Rs. 40/- p.m. . Misuse common passages etc for storing his belongings. In the mid  night he makes noise by throwing steel vessels ( for what he knows). He has kept surroundings very badly. There was a time when he would go up on terrace and piss in open. He does money lending business by keeping valuables of poor street hawkers etc who keep barging in on common passages on first floor residential areas affecting our safety.

Our mistake : My father gave him his own room without charging anything extra as he belonged to our own community from our hometown and was relative of a close well wisher.

I just got up and came out of my room this morning and Lo! he catches hold of me. He tells that the ceiling plaster has fallen and I must see that. He in the same breath adds that I must share atleast 50% of expense for repairs.

NOTE: I had personally appealed and then sent written request to all tenants to not to stop me on way and come to my office which is in same building for any discussion.

points to ponder:

1.I have been alone paying building taxes which are in thousands.
2. I am alone paying for common electricity bills, maintenance etc..
3. I am alone spending on maintaining common areas, terrace, and several amenities and have spent in lacs if last few years.
4. The shameless tenants pay only Rs 40/- p.m. but use much more the room, common toilets and parking illegally. Tenant Chadha does not even pay rent and has illegally settled a trespasser in building.
5. All hungry government staff specially BMC keep coming on some pretext and seek alms.
6. Even a child knows that building constructed in 1947 will now need major repairs and regularly.
7. They know landlord the shelter provider has no income to carry out any repairs atleast major and in their own rooms. Though I have been doing some urgent repairs of common areas as I know they will rape the building but will not contribute to maintain same.

Options:
1. Tenants have options of keeping good relations with landlord so their is team spirit but unfortunately all good tenants have left the building ( of course after taking market rate compensation) .
2. Tenants have option of persuading and cooperating with landlord for going for redevelopment but instead they do arm twisting by asking 3 times the area in return for giving cooperation. Why should a land lord succum to their blackmailing specially who are giving all sorts of abuses and troubles to landlord?
3. This tenant has always been on the side of most mischievous tenant and now seeks 50% share to repair his house which he used  for 60 years by paying only Rs 40/- p.m..

Rent act laws r reasonable and just but judiciary is sick and delaying so approaching courts is like calling for more trouble and letting advocates etc  loot you without giving any thing in return.