Driving licence not to be used as address proof orders Govt of Maharashtra

TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 29, 2011

There r some who have spent great deal of time and money in procuring driving licence and ration card illegally. Not only both are declared invalid but also calls for action under law for attempting and gathering illegally such documents......Alok

=================================================================================

 Driving licence not to be used as address proof Sarang Dastane, TNN Nov 26, 2011, 04.04PM IST
==============================================================

 Tags: residence proof|Driving License|circular PUNE:
=======================================================================

The driving license issued by the transport department cannot be used as a proof of residence, according to the state home department's(transport) recently issued circular. The circular issued by the chief secretary Ratnakar Gaikwad further states that the driving license is being used as proof of residence while applying for various certificates at the government offices and also while procuring the mobile SIM cards, telephone and LPG connections. The respective departments and agencies also accept the driving license as a residence proof. The circular has clarified that the license is issued only for the driving of vehicle; and it cannot be used as proof of residence. According to the circular, after collecting the information from the regional transport offices (RTO) pertaining to the driving licenses, the transport department has found that the applicants have furnished the licenses on fake addresses. The orders are issued to the respective RTOs to cancel such licenses and initiate action against the applicants. Considering such cases, the guidelines are being issued not to use driving license as a proof of residence. The circular has stated that it is must for a driver to carry the driving license while driving a vehicle.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

 http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-11-26/pune/30444302_1_license-transport-department-residence

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

 http://www.infoqueenbee.com/2011/11/driving-license-will-not-be-accepted-as.html

Illegal structures by tenant

http://www.dnaindia.com/mumbai/report_court-provides-no-relief-for-mumbai-tenant-who-built-illegal-safety-doors_1615722 Court provides no relief for Mumbai tenant who built illegal safety doors Published: Tuesday, Nov 22, 2011, 8:30 IST By Mustafa Plumber | Place: Mumbai | Agency: DNA A tenant, living in the same building where former Chief Justice of India MH Kania lived for years, failed to get any relief from the Bombay high court. Harshada Ghia lives in Prabhu Nivas building on Charni Road and has illegally built safety doors, blocking the common passage for the fire exit. In a letter attached as an annexure to the petition filed by Ghia, Kania had stated that safety doors were there when he was a tenant in the building, though he doesn’t remember whether the door was there on block no 21 on the building’s second floor. According to Ghia, the building was constructed in 1933 and he took over possession in 1975 from the landlord, Rajesh Reshamwala. In 2000, the tenants moved the small causes court against the landlord for doing minor repair works. In 2007, the landlord complained to the corporation, saying that the tenants on the second and fourth floor of the building had illegally built safety doors. The civic body issued notices to the tenants. Ghia said the building has been in existence since 1933 and the Mumbai Regional Town Planning Act, came into existence only in 1967. So, it would not apply to his case. A division bench of Justice PB Majmudar and Justice MR Bhatkar said: “You can’t claim relief even when other tenants have removed their illegal construction.” Ghia said the entire process of issuing a notice by the BMC was illegal and should be set aside. BMC counsel, Preeti Purandhare, who opposed the plea, said: “Three other tenants of the building have demolished their safety doors and have initiated proceedings at the city civil court. The present petitioner has no right to appeal directly and if he wants to challenge the notices issued by the civic body he should move the civil court along with other tenants.” Ghia wanted to withdraw his plea to take appropriate legal recourse. Purandhare opposed that, stating: “He can’t have everything at his convenience.” The bench dismissed the plea

ICICI bank,shameless Indian judicial system, capitalist govt, and looting system

To, All those concerned by looting of banks : Read my mail to : The CEO, ICICI Bank , Hon Chief Justice Supreme court of India ( slow judicial system), Ho, Finance minister, ( Hands in glove with looters of economy) Hon. Governor , RBI, ( Hands in glove with looters of economy) I believe the card is more then 5 yrs old but that may be a different ICICI card. I have always paid regularly but 1. Once the bill never came. Thanks for reversing charges. 2. I sent the chk but did not reach your bank as claimed but charges were reversed then . Thanks. 3. In present case . In 50 days both my parents expired and suddenly. Still chk was sent to ur ATM nr reliance energy counter at santacruz east but they have stopped the drop box system and I dont know what happened to that check and i immediately on knowing made payment. Yet Rs 400 /- is charged against outstanding of Rs 500/-  ( how the charges can be 90% of dues in question ) and interest rate is mindbogglingly high. My questions  are: 1.Why drop box facility is stopped in ATM. 2. Why there r no other drop  box in santacruz East Vakola area. 3. Why the delayed payment charges are so high. 4. why interest rate is so high/ 5. Pl. explain :   This would also help you to prevent any negative points in your credit rating. What do u mean by this ???  Are individuals rating done by mere delay in payment even when crisis in life are there?? When all actual usage amunt is paid and there is a dispute in paying unjustified high amount of penalty and interest. To, The governor , RBI, and To, Hon Finance minister, Pl. ensure that no adverse credit rating of any individual is done if all loan , usage amount of credit card etc are paid and there is a dispute in bank charges which are fixed unilaterally, are very high, and are comparable to patahan / colonial / sudkhor era. bent towards capitalism and govt is allowing this / is party to this shows they r hands in glove in this loot game and their claim for democracy for common man , socialism . and citizens welfare is only sloganeering. No other institution charges such high penalty and interests. Why RBI allows that for banks?? I am a shelter provider to those migrated to Mumbai as homeless and would have lived in slums or footpath. But the landlords gave them house so they could call their female to live decently , so that they do not go on highway and railway lines to attend to morning calls but the same government does lot allow to raise rent so we are still left to manage with Rs 30/- per month per room. That means for using the whole room of about 150 sq feet we can charge only Rs 1( ONE) per day. Then they use common [passages, toilets, garden , terraces , and whatever legally and illegally accessible), then they abuse and threaten landlords, then they illegally park cars in premises worth even Rs 8 lacs + , etc etc and yet pay no rent for 25 years , not even meager Rs 30/- per month. Options before me are pay 2000/- to recover Rs 30/- to advocate for notice. Then pay Rs 1 lac + , then xerox charges, then tips to bailiff for serving summons, pay so many out of pocket expenses and file a case against non paying tenant. Then use dirty paan spitted everywhere corridors, stairs, toilets of these great places of Justice of India , then waste your whole life on court benches as Judges get their salary and promotions even if they give only adjournments, advocates get fees in advance even if you have to chase for them as beggar when matter is called out, you keep giving tips to staff of advocate and courts and get nothing form any one of them for 20 years. And no court is charging Advocates for appearing without preparation, for not filing due papers in time, for parties not remaining present but banks change like nibble-man and thrive on such charges , make palatial offices and house with swimming pool for CEO of  ICICI bank. With this unjustifiable high penalties and interest. Am I slave for free person. I have to pay Rs 40/- for pay and park for  1 hour pay such high bank charges but recover Rs 30/- per month  for 150 sq feet and yet pay ever increasing municipal taxes from my pocket. All this is fixed and run and decided by govt, judiciary, and bureaucrats  of which I am a slave but called citizen with equal rights and privileges. What a cheating and fraud and day light robbery by all above. And worst is we have to bow to such people who do not deliver justice for decades as  slaves have been bowing to their masters. And my proffession: As a insurance agent clients do not want to fill form, want me to remind several times, want me to collect premium, help in claims, and do lot of other work ( like change of address etc ) but they want back my commission. But I have to pay to all thru noses. May be only lucky get a proffession where they can dictate, not perform and yet suck the blood. To, ICICI Bank, Pl. give me final figure of penalty which I can pay and cancel this card there after.  Thanks and Regards, Hema Tholiya, Marigold Hall,Tholiya Bhavan, 10Th Rd., Santacruz East, Mumbai 400055 9324225699 " Intense hate anywhere interferes with love everywhere ! " • Pl. fwd./ circulate this mail if you think the issues raised here needs wider audience. • Let us make our city beautiful, disciplined and Loveable. Let us handover to our future generation a better place to live in. • www.digambarjains.com : The matrimonial web site for Digambar Jains www.aloktholiya.blogspot.com • To subscribe to my very popular yahoogroup: Send blank mail to: menow-subscribe@yahoogroups.com RE:'ICICICARE=043-171-096' My credit card no. 4477478027306004 On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:19, ICICI Bank Customer Care wrote: This would also help you to prevent any negative points in your credit rating.

co op society asks 700/- pm for parking where as Bandra appeal court has ordered

co op society asks 700/- pm for parking where as Bandra appeal court has ordered mesne profit ( rent by evicted tenant) to be only Rs 1000/- pm and they park free illegally co-op society asks 700/- pm for parking where as Bandra appeal court has ordered mesne profit ( rent by evicted tenant) to be only Rs 1000/- pm and they park free illegally .The advocate for tenant is Ad Divyakant Mehta who is said to be a very successful advocate in small causes court and which u can see as instead of fighting on law points he is doing all the jugglery to delay the matter and is able to take ride of system. Some time u feel shocked to see courts blindly going on his demands. Car wars: The fight for space Sharanya Misra Sharma, Hindustan Times Mumbai, November 09, 2011 Email to Author First Published: 02:22 IST(9/11/2011) Last Updated: 02:22 IST(9/11/2011) Share more... 0 Comments Email print For the past six months, Artem Kumar, 28, a businessman who lives in a rented studio apartment in Khar, has been fighting with the managing committee of his housing society for parking space. The committee wants Kumar to pay Rs 700 every month to park his vehicle in the parking slot that belongs to his flat owner and landlord, even though the society collects parking charges from the owner every month. “The managing committee has made its own rule to make tenants pay for parking,” said Kumar. “Almost every second day, the committee members land up at my house and harass me.” Like Kumar, there are many flat owners and tenants across Mumbai who are fighting it out for parking space in a cramped city where the number of flat owners and the number of vehicles in a society exceeds the number of parking slots available. “The most common cause of disputes among society members is parking space,” said Wahid Ahmed, a real estate agent with Spaces Property Consultants in Juhu. NP Nathani, 41, a chartered accountant, bought a 2BHK in Thakur Complex, Kandivli (east), in 2004 and paid the builder Rs 1 lakh for parking. But now, seven years later, the society has demanded that he surrender his parking space so that it can re-allot all parking spaces in the building. “The society says it’s illegal for builders to sell parking space, so I have no right over that slot,” said Nathani. “The committee needs to take into account flat owners like me who have spent money buying parking slots. I am being denied my right to something that I have paid for.” Though it is illegal for builders to sell parking slots to homebuyers, the housing society bye-laws clearly state that if a resident has bought a parking space, then he or she is entitled to it. This discrepancy in the state laws and the bye-laws under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act is the source of many disputes across the city. Vivek Gupta, 47, a physician, is unwilling to pay the monthly parking charges because he has paid the builder Rs 2 lakh for a parking slot in his building on Peddar Road, where he owns a 2BHK. “The parking charge is not much, but I don’t see why I should be made to pay the society anything for parking,” he said. Anand Divekar, the chairman from Gupta’s society, argues that as it is illegal for the builder to sell parking space, it is only fair that Gupta pays parking charges like other residents of the society. Ahmed said in several housing societies, many flat owners are forced to park their cars outside the society compound, in some cases for as long as a decade. “Often, managing committee members allot extra parking spaces to themselves and their friends.” With society members fighting for space, there’s no thought given to the need for slots where visitors can park temporarily. Diven Pednekar, 26, a model, complains that no parking space is reserved for visitors in his society in Four Bungalows. “When guests come, they are told to park outside, on the road, because there isn’t adequate parking for society residents,” Pednekar said. This despite the fact that the Development Control Regulations state that 10% of the parking space in suburban societies and 25% of parking space in societies on the island city must be reserved for visitors.