Wednesday, May 27, 2015

Rent act amendment: My take with my own story: I am willing to participate any debate or TV show or discussion

Rent act amendment: The tenants of south Mumbai doing crores of rupees turnover, having big industries, palatial house and fat income are going on protest on issues of rent act:
My take with my own story: I am willing to participate any debate or TV show or discussion to explain that how sixty years landlords have been made to suffer and tenants , politicians never considered any relief to them as they are in minority and tenant are having more voting strength.
Times of India is a bullshit paper. Does not study the facts, does not study the proposed laws, and gives biased. It seems TOI owners ( sick jains) themselves and few reporters are themselves tenants. Firstly this proposed law protects small tenants. Even bigger tenants pay only small percentage of their declared income. So creamy layered tenants are not 5 lacs. And come and see facts of my two buildings where tenants do not pay rent as meager as Rs 40/- pm but give to dish antenna connection 500/- pm. There is a tenant Purohit with palatial bungalow in Jaipur, flies to US several times a year for gems and jewellery export business but to court he says he is poor and cant afford more then Rs 500/- per month as a mesne profit. This poor Purohit hired one of the costliest advocate D C Mehta. who wields lot of influence, Chadha has car worth Rs 10 lacs. Investment in shares for over few crores and claims he gets dividends more then Rs 10 lac a year. But does not pay rent for legally occupient 4 rooms for Rs 120/- pm and illegally erecting car shed , illegally covering common passage and so on. Mrs Bina Chowdhury filed a case in the year 1990 claiming that terrace too is tenanted to her. If she shows one single document which supports her claim then I will make her tenant of terrace too. But her influential advocate obtained injunction against me for terrace. Her advocate has ensured that case does not move an inch in 24 years and I am made to run to court for 24 years. She pays rs 138/- pm but occupies legally about six hundred square feet but claims she is tenant of entire floor consisting of common toilets and passage and terrace and space below staircase. She is also tenant of Wadia estate for over 15000 sq feet property and also tenant of another person for entire bungalow known as Jariwala building. She has huge investments but court is swayed by her old age, presentation and her advocate. Trespassers Ranjit hotel and Dhobi pay nothing but run commercial activity for years. TOI has given biased sensational reporting. Some one must find out what is their vested interest? Incidentally TOI owners are too Jains as I am. But they have breached tenets and teaching of Jainism by lying in news reporting. I am using all names and places and anyone is welcome to check what I am saying and if wrong then can file defamation suit on me.rather hang me if I am lying as that will be better then dying suffering as a shelter provider ( called as landlord) , suffering in court for decades and having to live with such tenants who do defamation of worst kind ( finally I have filed with all evidence defamation suit in Dindoshi court against chadha but case lingers on) , encroaching tenants, non paying tenants, a.......and so on..Alok Tholiya , 9324225699,atholiya@gmail.com

A state housing department plan to amend the Rent Control Act, which will increase rents drastically for...
TIMESOFINDIA.INDIATIMES.COM

No comments:

Post a Comment