I am willing to participate any debate or TV show or discussion to explain that how sixty years landlords have been made to suffer and tenants , politicians never considered any relief to them as they are in minority and tenant are having more voting strength.
Firstly this proposed law protects small tenants. Even bigger tenants pay only small percentage of their declared income. So creamy layered tenants are not 5 lacs. And come and see facts of my two buildings where tenants do not pay rent as meager as Rs 40/- pm but give to dish antenna connection 500/- pm. There is a tenant Purohit with palatial bungalow in Jaipur, flies to US several times a year for gems and jewellery export business but to court he says he is poor and can't afford more than Rs 500/- per month as a mesne profit. This poor Purohit hired one of the costliest advocate D C Mehta. who wields lot of influence, Chadha has car worth Rs 10 lacs. Investment in shares for over few crores and claims he gets dividends more than Rs 10 lac a year. But does not pay rent for legally occupient 4 rooms for Rs 120/- pm and illegally erecting car shed , illegally covering common passage and so on. Mrs Bina Chowdhury filed a case in the year 1990 claiming that terrace too is tenanted to her. If she shows one single document which supports her claim then I will make her tenant of terrace too. But her influential advocate obtained injunction against me for terrace. Her advocate has ensured that case does not move an inch in 24 years and I am made to run to court for 24 years. She pays rs 138/- pm but occupies legally about six hundred square feet but claims she is tenant of entire floor consisting of common toilets and passage and terrace and space below staircase. She is also tenant of Wadia estate for over 15000 sq feet property and also tenant of another person for entire bungalow known as Jariwala building. She has huge investments but court is swayed by her old age, presentation and her advocate. Trespassers
No comments:
Post a Comment